检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:许方钱[1]
出 处:《河北科技师范学院学报(社会科学版)》2012年第1期45-50,共6页Journal of Hebei Normal University of Science & Technology(Social Sciences)
摘 要:检察院对法院民事执行行为具有不同的检察监督方式,不同地方采用了不同做法,抗诉、检察建议、纠正违法通知书等方式的运用略显冗杂,缺乏统一标准。刚刚公布的《民事诉讼法修正案(草案)》虽然从立法层面对检察监督方式进行了相应的厘清,但修缮范围有限,并不能完全解决今后民事执行检察监督方式适用杂乱的问题。域外其他国家和地区的立法具有相对明晰的检察监督方式体系,值得我国借鉴、整改。Execution behavior of the civil court' s Procuratorate have different inspection and supervision methods, using different approaches in different places, the application of methods such as pretest, procuratorial suggestions and notice to rectify illegal act seem to be slightly jumbled and lack of uniform standards. Although The Code of Cidl Pro- cedure Amendment (Draft) just released clarified the ways of inspection and supervision from the legislative level, its amendment scope is limited and cannot solve the problems of disordered application of the ways of inspection and su- pervision of civilian implementation. Extraterritorial legislation in other countries has relatively clear system of inspec- tion and supervision methods, which is worth of our learning and rectification.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117