检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:姚卫群[1]
机构地区:[1]北京大学哲学系,北京100871
出 处:《杭州师范大学学报(社会科学版)》2012年第3期64-70,共7页Journal of Hangzhou Normal University(Humanities and Social Sciences)
基 金:教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地北京大学外国哲学研究所项目"印度婆罗门教哲学与佛教哲学比较研究"(08JJD720043)的研究成果
摘 要:佛教与婆罗门教对生命中存在的"苦"的现象十分重视,将探讨苦的形成、灭苦的途径等作为构建各自理论体系的出发点。两教关于苦的看法从思想来源上说与印度古代圣典奥义书有一定的关联;二者都认为轮回形态在本质上就是苦,苦产生的根本原因是人对世间事物或人生现象的本来面目不能予以正确认识。两教关于苦的种类以及消除无明的智慧的看法有重要差别。Buddhism and Brahmanism pay great attention to the phenomena of suffering in the lives. The starting point of building their theoretical system is to inquire into the formation of suffering, and into the method of eliminating the suffering. The viewpoints about the suffering in two schools have certain connection in thought source with Upanishad, which is the sacred scripture in ancient India. Both schools hold that the reincarnation in essence is pain. They also hold that the fundamental cause of suffering lies in not correctly understanding the real form of world things and life phenomena. In Buddhism and Brahmanism, there are important differences in terms of their viewpoints about the types of suffering and the wisdom that can eliminate ignorance.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222