检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国人民公安大学,北京100038 [2]北京市公安局门头沟分局,北京102300
出 处:《黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报》2012年第1期95-98,共4页Journal of Heilongjiang Administrative Cadre College of Politics and Law
摘 要:备受期待的沉默权没有被写入刑事诉讼法,这是根据具体国情适当选择的结果。然而沉默权问题越来越受到人们的关注,特别是在我国加入《公民权利与政治权利国际公约》之后。因为立法传统的缺乏、价值观的冲突及侦查机关的反对,目前我国还不能确立沉默权,但沉默权出现在中国司法体系中是一种大趋势。在立法上确立沉默权,通过合理地运用证据推定规则和辩诉交易原则,进而在中国确立有限的沉默权,是沉默权在中国的出路。The Right to Silence is not written into the Criminal Procedure Law,which is based on specific national conditions.The Right to Silence,however,is getting people's attention more and more,particularly after our country joined "International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights".Because of the lack of legislation,the conflict of traditional values and the opposition of the investigation organ,we still cannot establish the Right to Silence in the Criminal Procedure Law at present.The Right to Silence in Chinese judicial system is a kind of big trend.It is the right rule to silence right in China that establish reticence right firstly,and through reasonable use of presumptive evidence rules and Plea-bargaining system,and then establish limited right to silence in China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3