机构地区:[1]中国医科大学口腔医学院牙周科,沈阳110002 [2]中国医科大学口腔医学院中心实验室,沈阳110002
出 处:《中华口腔医学杂志》2012年第6期329-334,共6页Chinese Journal of Stomatology
基 金:辽宁省博士科研启动基金(20091117)
摘 要:目的观察17-β雌二醇(estradiol,E2)对牙龈卟啉单胞菌(Porphyromonas gingivalis,Pg)W83作用下人牙周膜细胞(human periodontal ligament cells,hPDLC)白细胞介素(interleukin,IL)6和IL-8表达的影响。方法原代培养hPDLC,传至第4代,分别以①10^-30 mol/LE2(E:1组);②10^-7mol/LE2(E22组);③感染复数为10:1的Pg(Pgl组);④感染复数为100:1的Pg(Pg2组);⑤感染复数为100:1的魄+10^-10mol/LE2(Pg2+E21组);⑥感染复数为100:1的魄+10^-7 mol/LE,(Pg2+E,2组)处理hPDLC12和24h;以0.1%无水乙醇为对照组,酶联免疫吸附测定法检测细胞IL-6和IL-8蛋白的表达水平,实时荧光定量反转录聚合酶链法检测24hmRNA水平。采用单因素方差分析比较各组IL-6、IL-8蛋白和mRNA表达水平的组间差异,最小显著性差异事后比较检验进行组间差异的两两比较,采用独立样本t检验分析各组12和24hIL-6、IL-8表达水平的差异,检验水准为双侧d=0.05。结果Pg2组24h时IL-6蛋白表达水平[(2482.88±26.53)ng/L]显著高于Pgl组[(734.09±87.90)ng/L]、对照组[(425.8±77.25)ng/L]和12h时的Pg2组[(1157.50±234.65)ng/L,P=0.000];pg2组24h时IL-8蛋白表达水平[(4965.81±1072.55)ng/L]显著高于Pgl组[(803.51±162.08)ng/L,P=0.007]、对照组[(400.75±2.27)ng/L,P=0.005]和12h时的Pg2组[(1431.12±82.78)ng/L,P=0.001]。E2对hPDLCIL-6和IL-8的表达无显著调节作用。与感染复数100:1的Pg单独作用相比,E:和Pg联合处理24h显著促进了hPDLCIL-6的表达水平,而未影响IL-8的表达水平:Pg2+E:1组、Pg2+E:2组IL-6mRNA相对于磷酸甘油醛脱氢酶的表达水平(分别为0.49±0.15、0.53±0.16)显著高于Pg2组(0.19±0.06)(P=0.021,P=0.036),两组IL_6蛋白水平[分别为(5512.66±1022.07)、(6988.78±2279.13)ng/L]�Objective To investigate the effects of 17-13 estradiol (E2 ) and Porphyromonas gingivalis(Pg)W83 on the expression of interleukin( IL)-6 and IL-8 in human periodontal ligament cells (hPDLC). Methods Primary cultures of hPDLC were established and the cells of passage four were treated with 10-^10 mol/L E2, 10^-7 mol/L E2 or PgW83 individually or E2 combined with PgW83. The expression levels of IL-6 and IL-8 protein at 12 h and 24 h were measured with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and the levels of mRNA at 24 h were detected with real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. Results The expression level of IL-6 reached ( 2482. 88 ± 26. 53 ) ng/L in hPDLC treated with Pg at multiplicity of infection(MOI) of 100 for 24 h, which was significantly higher than that in hPDLC treated withPgat MOI of 10:1 [(734.09±87.90) ng/L, P=0.000], the controls [(425.8 ±77.25) ng/L, P = 0. 0001 and that in hPDLC treated with Pg at MOI of 100 for 12 h [ ( 1157.50 ± 234. 65 ) ng/L, P = 0. 000]. The expression level of IL-8 reached (4965.81 ± 1072. 55 ) ng/L in hPDLC treated with Pg at MOI of 100 for 24 h, which was significantly higher than that in hPDLC treated with Pg at MOI of 10 [ (803.51 ± 162. 08) ng/L, P =0. 007], the controls [ (400. 75 ±2. 27) ng/L, P =0. 005] and that in hPDLC treated with Pg at MOI of 100 for 12 h [ ( 1431.12 ± 82. 78) ng/L, P = 0. 0011- E2 did not show remarkable effect on the expressions of IL-6 and IL-8. E2 combined with Pg (MOI = 100:1 ) significantly promoted the expression levels of IL-6 at 24 h while did not influence those of IL-8. The relative mRNA level of IL-6 in hPDLC treated with 10^-10 mol/L E2 or 10 -7 mol/L E2 combined with Pg were 0.49 ± 0. 15 ( P = 0. 021 ) and 0. 53 ±0. 16(P = 0. 036) individually, which were significantly higher than that treated with Pg alone, 0. 19 ±0.06. The protein level of IL-6 in hPDLC treated with 10^-l0 moL/L E2 or 10-7 mol/L E2 combined with Pgwere (5512.66±1022.07�
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...