论交付占有在不动产物权变动中的地位——兼对《物权法》第九条第一款之检视  

Legal Status of Delivery and Possession in Alteration of Real Property Rights——Also a Review on Article I,Provision Nine,the Property Law

作　　者：赵海萍[1] 

机构地区：[1]镇江高等专科学校人文科学系,江苏镇江212003

出　　处：《太原师范学院学报（社会科学版）》2012年第2期45-49,共5页Journal of Taiyuan Normal University:Social Science Edition

基　　金：江苏省"青蓝工程"优秀青年骨干教师资助项目(苏教师200830号)

摘　　要：《物权法》第九条第一款采用"登记生效主义"的不动产物权变动规则忽略了占有在不动产物权变动中的法律地位,既不符合现实不动产交易的需求,也与其他法律法规存在矛盾与冲突,给司法实践中如何适用不动产物权变动规则带来困扰。物权公示与物权变动是两个不同层面的问题,其属性完全不同;交付占有作为不动产物权变动的方式符合安全、效率、公平的价值;从相关立法规范考察,我国法律法规和最高人民法院的司法解释以及外国不动产物权变动立法都赋予了交付具有重要的意义。我国物权法应明确交付在不动产物权变动中的法律效果,交付要件主义加登记对抗主义的不动产物权变动模式应是我国立法和司法的理想选择。＂The registration Effectiveness＂ in the rules for alteration of real property rights adopted in Article I,Provision Nine of the Property Law ignores the legal status of possession in the alteration of real property rights.It is not only inconsistent with the actual needs in real estate transactions,but also contradictory to other current laws in China.Some problems accrue from it for the judicial practice.The publication of property rights and the alteration of such rights are issues of different aspects with completely different natures.As an alteration mode,delivery and possession of real property accords with efficiency,safety,fair value.Viewing from relevant legislation norms,China＇s laws and regulations,the judicial explanations by Supreme Court,and foreign legislations on alteration of real estate property right endow the delivery great significance.China＇s Law on real property rights should explicitly define the legal efficiency of alteration in real estate property rights,and the ideas of essential conditions for deliver plus registration confrontation should be an ideal in China＇s legislative and judicial choice for the mode of alteration of real estate property rights.

关 键 词：交付 占有 不动产 物权变动 物权公示 

分 类 号：D923.2[政治法律—民商法学]