连续镇静与传统方法的伦理学比较  

Ethical Comparison between Continuous Calm and the Traditional Method

作　　者：温新意[1] 蒋碧华[2] 崔宇龙[2] 

机构地区：[1]温州市第三人民医院麻醉科,浙江温州325000 [2]中南大学湘雅二医院麻醉科,湖南长沙410011

出　　处：《中国医学伦理学》2012年第2期239-241,共3页Chinese Medical Ethics

摘　　要：对安乐死的争论由来已久,实施起来有一定阻力。而临终关怀在理论上虽然可行,但是限于人力、财力、物力以及治疗技术,现阶段难以广泛深入的开展。而近20多年来实施的终末期病人连续镇静技术,一方面可以使患者从极度痛苦中解脱,另一方面又避开了其在伦理学和法律上的缺陷,是一种在临床容易实施,易于被患者、家属以及社会接受的终末期治疗方法。Issues about euthanasia has been argued for a long time, the implementation of it have a certain resistance. And in theory, hospice care is feasible, but limited to human, financial, material resources and treatment technique, having difficulty in extensive development. However, almost 20 years of implement continuous calm technology in the end- stage patients, firstly, can make a patient away from extreme pain relief, secondly, avoid the ethical and legal defects, and it is a way of end - stage treatment, which is easy to implement, easy to be accepted by patients, family and society.

关 键 词：安乐死 临终关怀 镇静 医学伦理学 死亡伦理 

分 类 号：R-052[医药卫生]