检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:姜振家[1] 初书田[1] 陈涛[1] 王娟娟[1] 付倩[1]
机构地区:[1]青岛大学医学院附属医院,山东青岛266003
出 处:《中国医院管理》2012年第5期32-34,共3页Chinese Hospital Management
基 金:山东省软科学研究计划(2010RKGA3017)
摘 要:目的构建科学、实用的医院管理培训效果评估指标体系。方法通过预调查和专家访谈设计指标体系,运用Delphi法进行指标的筛选,层次分析法用于指标权重的确定。结果构建的培训效果评估指标体系包括反应层、学习层、行为层和结果层4个层面的11项一级指标和54项二级指标,确定了各级指标的权重,指标权重判断矩阵排序一致性比率均小于0.100;2轮调查问卷的有效回收率均高于90%,专家的权威系数均在0.8以上,指标变异系数为0.08~0.22之间,协调系数经检验呈显著性(P<0.001)。结论构建的医院管理培训效果评估指标体系层次分明,指标数量适中,权重合理稳定,具备良好的可操作性。Objective To establish scientific and reasonable evaluation index system of hospital management training effect. Method The methods of pre-investigation and expert interview were adopted for index system design. The in- dexes were screened by applying Delphi method. Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was used to set weight coefficient of each index. Result The system included 4 levels, 11 ClassⅠ indexes and 54 Class Ⅱ indexes. The weight of indexes were identified, CR〈0.100. The respond rates of two-round questionnaire were all higher than 90%. The authority coeffi- cient of experts was beyond 0.8. The indexes variation coefficient were 0.08 ~ 0.22. Coefficient of Kendall's W was sig- nificant by inspection (P〈0.001). Conclusion Hospital management training effect evaluation index system has a clear hierarchical structure, moderate number of indicators, reasonably stable weight and good workability, which can work as an effective tool for training effect evaluation.
分 类 号:R197.32[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145