检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:林海骏[1]
出 处:《中山大学研究生学刊(社会科学版)》2012年第1期93-104,共12页Journal of the Graduates Sun YAT-SEN University(Social Sciences)
摘 要:本文通过对我国民事诉讼法律规定和司法实践的分析,认为我国现行民事诉讼结构属于强职权主义型民事诉讼结构。这一诉讼结构制约着当事人权益的保护和程序正义的实现。立足于诉讼公正与诉讼效率的角度,本文认为我国应当构建平等协作型民事诉讼结构:一方面保证各诉讼主体之间的平等,恢复当事人程序主体之地位,建立有约束力的处分权原则和辩论原则。另一方面,二者在相互制衡的基础上进行协作,促进纠纷的高效率解决。By analyzing the Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China, its relevant regulations and judicial practice, the author considers the structure of civil procedure in China as strongly inquisitorial system. This structure has many disadvantages, such as insufficient protection of the litigants'right and procedural justice. On basis of justice and efficiency, we should construct equal and cooperative system. On the one hand, we should ensure the equality of the subjects of litigation and recognize the procedure subjectivity of litigants. We should adopt the restrict disposition rules and debating principle. On the other hand, the litigants and court should cooperate on basis of checks and balances. Thus, the civil procedure can solve the dispute with efficiency.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200