检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张志霞[1] 周宏志[2] 刘瑶[1] 丰培勋[1] 王炎[1] 赵梅[1] 刘岚[1]
机构地区:[1]武警陕西总队医院口腔科,西安710054 [2]第四军医大学口腔医学院口腔颌面外科
出 处:《实用口腔医学杂志》2012年第3期398-400,共3页Journal of Practical Stomatology
摘 要:为对比微创拔牙术与传统翻瓣劈冠术拔除阻生智齿的临床效果,将260例下颌智齿阻生患者随机分为2组,分别采用翻瓣劈冠法(对照组)和微创拔牙术(微创组)拔除患牙,并比较其手术时间和术后并发症发生率。结果发现微创组拔牙时间明显少于劈冠组,术后疼痛、张口受限、感染和干槽症等并发症发生率也均低于对照组(P均<0.05)。260 patients with symptomatic impacted mandibular third molar were randomly and equally divided into two groups.The impacted teeth were removed by flap surgery and crest splitting in control group,and by minimizing trauma procedure in trial group.The operative duration and incidences of postoperative complications were compared between two groups.The operation time was(24±6) min in minimizing trauma group and(38±15) min in control group(P0.05).The incidences of postoperative complications of pain,limited mouth opening,infection and dry socket were lower in minimizing trauma group than those in control group(P0.05).
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222