检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孟泉[1]
出 处:《中国劳动关系学院学报》2012年第2期86-90,共5页Journal of China University of Labor Relations
基 金:国家社会科学基金资助项目<集体劳动关系法律规制体系研究>(11BFX079)资助
摘 要:自1950年代,英国的劳动制度改革经历了从"自愿主义"到"新自由主义"为指导原则的转变。1997年新工党执政以来,劳动制度的改革在"新自由主义"的继续影响下,反映出政府试图能够在经济效率与工人发言权之间找到平衡。然而,严格的法律规制使劳动争议的处理在实际操作中陷入了困局,并导致新的更加灵活的劳资争议处理方式受到广泛认同。这说明英国劳动制度的改善需要兼顾规范性和灵活性两个方面,才能成为真正调节劳动关系,处理劳资争议的有效手段。Since 1950s,the guiding principle of labor system reform of the UK has transformed from voluntarism to neo-liberalism.Since the New Labour came into power in 1997,under the influence of neo-liberalism,the labor system reform has reflected the government had tried to realize the balance between economic efficiency and workers' discourse power.However,the system of labor dispute settlement has fallen into dilemma since the strict legal regulation,and the more flexible mode is received widely.This shows that the labor system reform of the UK must attend simultaneously to regulation and flexibility so as to coordinate labor relations and resolve labor dispute effectively.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49