检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:田满文[1]
机构地区:[1]江苏师范大学经济学院
出 处:《财经科学》2012年第6期18-25,共8页Finance & Economics
摘 要:转轨时期政府干预是并购效率的关键影响因素之一,目前这方面的研究还非常不够。本文从政府干预的行政层次、国有控制权转移及终极控制人变更等多维角度,深入剖析政府干预对并购效率的影响。研究发现:并购市场的资源配置效率稳步上升,但政府干预对公司并购产生负面影响,各级政府对公司并购的干预程度有差异导致并购效率有差异。随着政府干预从中央到省、市、县各级政府的强化,其并购效率依次递减。国有控制权转移市场受政府干预影响其并购效率不高,终极控制人变更下的国有控制权转移绩效相对较高。During the transition period government intervention is one of the key factors of M&A efficiency. The current research in this area is still very inadequate. From the multi - dimensional angle of the administration level of government intervention, the takeovers of state- owned enterprises, Change of ultimate control and so on, this paper analyzes the influence of government intervention on the impact of M&A efficiency deeply. It finds: the resource allocation efficiency of M&A is rising with steady steps, but the government intervention has the negative influence to the company M&A; All levels of the government intervention have the difference so that it causes the difference of the M&_A efficiency. With government intervention from the central to provincial, city and county to strengthen the M&A efficiency is decreasing, the M&A efficiency of the state - owned domination shift is low by cause of government intervention; The state - owned domination shift achievements of the ultimate control person change are relatively high.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30