刑事诉讼法再修改后刑事警察权与公民权的平衡  被引量:7

On Balance Between Criminal Police Power and Civil Rights after the Adoption of Remodification of Criminal Procedure Law

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:陈卫东[1] 

机构地区:[1]中国人民大学法学院

出  处:《法学家》2012年第3期71-80,177,共10页The Jurist

摘  要:刑事诉讼中的警察权是维护社会安全的公共权力,然而,如果其行使越过法律的界限,就会侵犯公民的合法权利。刑事诉讼法再修改过程中社会上出现的对"秘密拘捕"的质疑,就反映出公众对刑事警察权不当行使的担忧。因此,在《刑事诉讼法》修正之后制定司法解释时,应在细化限制刑事警察权的相关规定,兼顾人权保障,设置违反程序的后果,以实现刑事警察权与公民权之间的平衡。The police power in criminal proceedings is an important force to maintain the security and stability of society.However,if the execution of criminal police power is only for the purpose of combating crime at the cost of crossing the red line which protects human rights,it will infringe the citizens' legitimate rights,and in turn endanger the social order.During re-amending the criminal procedure law,there is a vigorous debate on 'secret arrest',which reflects the public concerns about improper execution of police power.Therefore,it is necessary to balance between combating crime and protecting human rights when formulate judicial interpretation after the adoption of the re-amended criminal procedure law.That is,it shall elaborate the limit of the criminal police power in the amendment,and set the consequences of the violation of procedural to respond to public concerns and realize the balance between criminal police power and civil rights.

关 键 词:刑事诉讼法 刑事警察权 公民权 司法解释 

分 类 号:D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象