检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈卫东[1]
机构地区:[1]中国人民大学法学院
出 处:《法学家》2012年第3期71-80,177,共10页The Jurist
摘 要:刑事诉讼中的警察权是维护社会安全的公共权力,然而,如果其行使越过法律的界限,就会侵犯公民的合法权利。刑事诉讼法再修改过程中社会上出现的对"秘密拘捕"的质疑,就反映出公众对刑事警察权不当行使的担忧。因此,在《刑事诉讼法》修正之后制定司法解释时,应在细化限制刑事警察权的相关规定,兼顾人权保障,设置违反程序的后果,以实现刑事警察权与公民权之间的平衡。The police power in criminal proceedings is an important force to maintain the security and stability of society.However,if the execution of criminal police power is only for the purpose of combating crime at the cost of crossing the red line which protects human rights,it will infringe the citizens' legitimate rights,and in turn endanger the social order.During re-amending the criminal procedure law,there is a vigorous debate on 'secret arrest',which reflects the public concerns about improper execution of police power.Therefore,it is necessary to balance between combating crime and protecting human rights when formulate judicial interpretation after the adoption of the re-amended criminal procedure law.That is,it shall elaborate the limit of the criminal police power in the amendment,and set the consequences of the violation of procedural to respond to public concerns and realize the balance between criminal police power and civil rights.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.79