对钓鱼欺诈中第三方支付机构作为或不作为法律问题的思考  

The Legal Responsibility of the Third-Party Payment Institution in Phishing Fraud

作　　者：黎四奇[1] 

机构地区：[1]湖南大学法学院,湖南长沙410082

出　　处：《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》2012年第3期178-185,共8页Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law

基　　金：国家社科基金项目(11BFX051);湖南大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目

摘　　要：钓鱼欺诈是与第三方支付相伴而生的、利用技术不法套利的现象。在对被欺诈者进行法律救济时,第三方支付机构究竟应该扮演什么样的角色,是一个比较尴尬的问题。基于买方市场、第三方支付行业自身的特点、技术与法律的关联等从实体与程序上标明第三方支付机构应对该类突发事件的作为义务及对相关法律进行适时创新事关该新兴行业的发展与壮大。Phishing fraud with the company of third - party payment is an issue to attain iltegal interest by means of technology In the face of the remedy arising from frauds, what role should be played by the third - party payment institution on the circumstance of law, which is an awkward problem. It is about the development and growth to innovate rules dealing with anti - phishing fraud from the positive and proceeding laws based on buyer market, the attribution of third - party pay- ment, and the relationship between technology and law.

关 键 词：第三方支付 钓鱼 反欺诈 

分 类 号：DF414[政治法律—经济法学]