检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱磊[1] 余锦豪[1] 徐远志[1] 尚光伟[1] 唐小山[1] 汪饶饶[1]
机构地区:[1]同济大学附属第十人民医院口腔医疗中心,上海200072
出 处:《口腔材料器械杂志》2012年第2期70-72,共3页Chinese Journal of Dental Materials and Devices
摘 要:目的研究FlexMaster镍钛机用器械根管再治疗清理的效果。方法选取临床拔除的40颗单根管前牙,用改良式逐步后退法进行根管预备,牙胶尖与碧兰糊剂侧方加压充填根管。放置30d后随机分为两组,A组用H型锉去除根管内旧充填物,B组用FlexMaster镍钛机用器械去除充填物。分别记录操作时间。然后,将牙根纵劈,立体显微镜下观察根管冠1/3、根中1/3和根尖1/3段的残留物情况。结果在根管冠1/3处两种方法的根管清理效果无统计学差异(P>0.05)。在根管的中段和根尖段,B组的残留物量较A组少,两组间存在显著性差异(P<0.05)。B组操作时间明显少于A组,两组间也有显著性差异(P<0.01)。结论与手用H型锉相比,FlexMaster镍钛机用根管预备器械去除根管旧充填物效果更好,且操作时间显著减少。Objective To study the retreatment effectiveness of FlexMaster NiTi rotary instruments. Methods 40 extracted single-rooted anterior teeth were divided into two groups, 20 in each. They were instrumented by modified step- back flare technique and obdurated with gutta-percha and cortisomol sealer using lateral condensation. Retreatment of group A was performed by H files, group B by using FlexMaster NiTi rotary instruments. The time of retreatment was recorded. The teeth were then split longitudinally into halves. The remaining gutta-percha/sealer on the apical , middle, coronal parts of the root canal walls were visually scored with a stereomicroscope. Results In the apical and middle sections,less resid- ual filling material was observed in group B than in group A( P 〈 0.05 ). The mean operating time of group B was signifi- cantly less than that of group A. Conclusions The retreatment effectiveness of FlexMaster is better than that of H files.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.156.43