检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《科学学与科学技术管理》2012年第6期138-148,共11页Science of Science and Management of S.& T.
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目(11BGL013);上海市教委科研创新重点项目(10ZS96);上海市(第三期)管理科学与工程重点学科项目(S30504)
摘 要:整合团队任务、情感自反性与产品创新理论,探索团队任务自反性对产品创新绩效的影响,团队情感自反性对任务自反性与产品创新绩效之间关系的调节作用,以及贫缺、凝固、失谐和适配四种团队状态产品创新绩效的差异性。利用长三角地区76个研发团队的实证数据表明:团队任务自反性与产品创新绩效显著正相关;团队情感自反性对任务自反性与产品创新绩效之间的关系具有显著调节作用;适配状态产品创新绩效明显高于贫缺、凝固和失谐状态产品创新绩效,而贫缺、凝固和失谐状态产品创新绩效并无显著差异。Integrating team task and affective reflexivity, and the product innovation theory, this paper tries to ex- plore the effects of team task reflexivity on product innovation outcomes, the way the team affective reflexivity to moderate the relationship between team task reflexivity and product innovation outcomes, and the difference of prod- uct innovation outcomes of poor functioning teams, cosy teams, cold efficiency teams and fully function teams. The results from the empirical study on the 76 R&D team showed that team task reflexivity has positive impacts on product innovation outcomes, team affective reflexivity has great impacts on the relationship between team task reflex- ivity and product innovation outcom higher than the performances of the es, the other performance of product innovation of the fully function teams is positively type teams, and the differences between the performances of poor functioning teams, cosy teams, and cold efficiency teams do not make sense. The research provides significant results that have practical application in production innovation outcomes stimulated by team task and affective reflexivity.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28