仲裁协议效力认定主体探讨  

Reflections on Certification Bodies of Arbitration Agreement Validity

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:潘绮甜[1] 

机构地区:[1]广东商学院法学院,广东广州510320

出  处:《韶关学院学报》2012年第5期90-93,共4页Journal of Shaoguan University

摘  要:国外一般规定仲裁协议效力由仲裁庭来决定,集中体现为仲裁庭自裁管辖权原则,此原则已得到世界各国的广泛认可。而目前我国将仲裁协议效力的认定主体赋予仲裁委员会和法院,且法院有优先管辖权,这不符合国际商事仲裁的惯例,阻碍了仲裁事业的发展。运用比较分析法去论证我国立法规定的利弊,明确仲裁庭自裁管辖权确立的必要性,有利于完善这一立法。Generally the arbitral tribunal has the power to decide arbitration agreement validity in foreign countries, which is mainly reflected in the principle of jurisdiction?of?.arbitration. This principle has received wide recognition all over the world. However, China's legislation provides both arbitral tribunal and the court have the right to decide the validity of the arbitration agreement, and the court even takes precedence over the jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal, which is incompatible with the practice of international commercial arbitration. Here, it's necessary to make analysis of the pros and cons of legislation, then put forward establishing the principle of jurisdiction of arbitration, etc.

关 键 词:仲裁协议 效力 自裁管辖权 司法监督 

分 类 号:D925.7[政治法律—诉讼法学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象