高中生防御方式与父母教养方式的相关分析  

Relationship between defense styles and parental rearing styles of high school student

作　　者：宋红梅[1] 王立金[2] 翟长平[1] 吴维[1] 骆祥芬[1] 

机构地区：[1]安徽省荣军医院,安徽怀远233400 [2]蚌埠医学院精神医学系

出　　处：《中国民康医学》2012年第11期1300-1302,共3页Medical Journal of Chinese People’s Health

摘　　要：目的:探讨高中生防御方式与父母教养方式之间的关系。方法:采用防御方式问卷(DSQ)和父母教养方式评价量表(EMBU)对596名中学生施以团体测验。结果:男、女学生除中间型防御机制差异显著性外,不成熟防御机制、成熟防御机制及掩饰因子均无显著差异(P>0.05);男生在投射、潜意显现、抱怨、分裂、伴无能之全能、同一化和期望因子分上明显高于女生,女生在退缩、反作用形成、理想化因子上明显高于男生,且有统计学意义(P<0.05～P<0.01)。父母教养方式在惩罚、严厉、过分干涉、偏爱被试、拒绝、否认、过度保护及过干涉、过保护、偏爱被试上的平均得分男生均显著高于女生,且有统计学意义(P<0.05～P<0.01)。防御方式的部分因子和父母教养方式中的部分因子存在显著相关,且有性别上的差异。结论:父母的教养方式对子女的防御方式有重要影响。Objective：To explore relationship between defense mechanism and parental rearing patterns.Methods：596 high school students were tested with EMBU and DSQ in group.Results： Male and female students in addition to the intermediate defense mechanism differences with the addition,immature defense mechanisms mature defense mechanisms and conceal factor there was no significant difference（P〉0.05）;boys appeared in the projection,the subconscious mind,complain and split,with the incompetence of the Almighty,the same,and expectations factor score was significantly higher than girls,girls retreat,reaction formation,was significantly higher than boys on the idealized factor,and statistically significant（P〈0.05~P〈0.01）.Way of parenting in the punishment,harsh,excessive interference,preference test,rejection,denial,overprotection and over-interference,over-protection,preference test on the average score of boys were significantly higher than girls,and there is statistically significant（P〈0.05~P〈0.01）.The parts of factors of DSQ had significant relation with the parts of factors of EMBU.Conclusions： Parental rearing style has important influence on children mental defense style.

关 键 词：父母教养方式 防御方式 中学生 

分 类 号：B844.2[哲学宗教—发展与教育心理学]