论刑事诉讼法修正案草案中发回重审制度之建构  

On the Legal Regime of Remanding a Case to the Original Court for a Retrial in the Draft Amendment of Criminal Procedure Law

作　　者：张元鹏[1] 李寿荣[2] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民公安大学,北京100038 [2]北华航天工业学院,河北廊坊065000

出　　处：《桂海论丛》2012年第3期106-110,共5页Guihai Tribune

基　　金：中国人民公安大学学生科研创新项目课题<刑事发回重审制度研究>(11SKB001)的结项研究成果

摘　　要：刑事诉讼二审中的发回重审制度一直是人们争论不休的课题。新草案对二审中的发回重审仅仅提到了一点,即限制因事实不清证据不足而发回重审的次数。但这种蜻蜓点水式的修改依然不能令人满意,而且存在着理解上的歧义。文章比较分析了草案前后对发回重审的不同规定,并结合草案和现行刑诉法关于二审中发回重审的规定分析了发回重审存在的矛盾,最后借刑诉法修改之际提出了自己关于二审中发回重审的修改意见,希望新法能够对此进行明确合理地规定,让正义能够以看得见的方式实现。The legal regime of remanding a case to the original court for a retrial in the second instance of criminal proceedings has been a vexed subject. Although there is a minor change in the draft amendment of criminal procedure law, i.e. to limit the times of remanding a case to the original court for a retrial because of unclear facts and insufficient evidences in the original judgment, this superficial revision is still not satisfactory and ambiguous. This paper compares the different provisions of remanding a case to the original court for a retrial in different draft amendments, analyzes the conflict of the provision of remanding a case to the original court for a retrial between the existing criminal procedure law and the draft amendment, and finally puts forward the author＇s revised opinion and hopes that the new criminal procedure law can give a clear and reasonable provision so that justice can achieve in a visible manner.

关 键 词：刑事诉讼法 二审 发回重审 修改草案 

分 类 号：DF73[政治法律—诉讼法学]