机构地区:[1]中国医学科学院北京协和医学院肿瘤医院内科,100021
出 处:《中华肿瘤杂志》2012年第6期465-468,共4页Chinese Journal of Oncology
基 金:基金项目:吴阶平医学基金会临床科研专项资助基金(320.670010006);杨森科学研究委员会中国分会基金;中国癌症基金会基金
摘 要:目的比较多西他赛联合卡铂(TP)方案与表柔比星联合环磷酰胺序贯多西他赛(EC.T)方案辅助治疗三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)的Ⅲ期临床研究的安全性。方法2010年1月至2011年9月,经术后病理证实的95例I~Ⅲ期TNBC患者随机分为EC—T组(47例)和TP组(48例)接受术后化疗。EC-T组:环磷酰胺600mg/m2,表柔比星90mg/m2,静脉滴注,第1天,每3周重复,共4个周期;序贯多西他赛80mg/m2,第1天,每3周重复,共4个周期。TP组:多西他赛75mg/m2,卡铂曲线下面积(AUC)=5,静脉滴注,第1天,每3周重复,共6个周期。化疗后根据病情给予辅助放疗。以x2检验比较两组患者不良反应的发生率。结果76例患者可评价不良反应,其中EC-T组37例,中位年龄47岁,绝经前21例(56.8%);TP组39例,中位年龄46岁,绝经前22例(56.4%)。EC-T组患者均按计划完成化疗,TP组有2例(5.1%)患者因骨髓抑制未完成化疗。在化疗期间,EC-T组和TP组均有9例患者进行剂量调整。76例患者的不良反应以1—2级较常见。EC-T组和TP组患者3~4级脱发的发生率分别为29.7%和10.3%(P=0.033),呕吐的发生率分别为21.6%和7.7%(P=0.085),白细胞减少的发生率分别为54.1%和25.6%(P=0.011),中性粒细胞减少的发生率分别为51.4%和35.9%(P=0.174)。其他3—4级不良反应少见。除周围神经毒性和色素沉着外,其他不良反应均在化疗结束后1个月内恢复。结论EC—T和TP方案辅助治疗可手术TNBC患者的不良反应可以耐受,接受TP方案治疗的患者3~4级脱发和白细胞减少的发生率较低。Objective Triple-negative [ estrogen receptor (ER) -/progesterone receptor (PR) -/ HER2-] breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for ~ 15% of overall breast cancer and associated with a poor prognosis. There is a short of standard adjuvant chemotherapy regimens for TNBC. A number of studies have shown that TNBC might be sensitive to cisplatin and carboplatin on the basis that dysfunction of BRCA1 and its pathway is associated with a specific DNA-repair defect, but data of adjuvant setting about this is limited. Methods From January 2010 to September 2011, 95 early triple-negative breast cancer patients confirmed by pathology were randomly assigned to receive TP ( docetaxel 75 mg/m2, carboplatin AUC = 5, day 1, 21 days a cycle for 6 cycles) or EC-T (epirubicin 90 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2,d1, 21days a cycle for 4 cycles, followed by docetaxel 80 mg/m2, d1, 21 days a cycle for 4 cycles) chemotherapy. Adjuvant radiation therapy was given selectively after chemotherapy. Here we report a preliminary safety analysis with the chi-square test. Results Seventy-six out of the 95 patients had completed the chemotherapy and could be assessed for the safety profiles of the regimens. Thirty-seven of them were in the EC-T group with a median age of 47 years, and 21 out of these 37 patients were premenopausal (56.8%). Another 39 patients came from the TP group with a median age of 46 years, and 22 out of these 39 patientswere premenopausal ( 56.4% ). All of the 37 patients in EC-T group completed the planned treatment whereas 2 patients of the 39 cases in TP group did not because of bone marrow suppression. During the treatments, 9 patients had dose adjustment in each group. Adverse events of grade 1/2 were common. Specific incidence of adverse events with grade 3/4 in each group was as follows: alopecia, 29.7% vs. 10.3% (P=0.033), vomiting 21.6% vs. 7.7% (P =0. 085), leukopenia 54.1% vs. 25.6% (P = 0.011) and neutropenia 51.4% vs. 35.9% ( P = 0. 174). Other grade 3/4 toxicities were
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...