刑事审判中实物证据的审查判断及排除  

The Evaluation and Exclusion of Physical Evidence in Criminal Trails

作　　者：罗智勇[1] 冯黔刚[2] 

机构地区：[1]最高人民法院审监庭 [2]最高人民法院刑三庭

出　　处：《证据科学》2012年第2期155-164,共10页Evidence Science

摘　　要：刑事审判中,实物证据以其特有的客观性、稳定性和不可替代性特征而对于案件事实的认定发挥着令人更为信服的证实作用,从而显示出实物证据的证明优势。但实物证据在刑事诉讼证明中,也存在其一定的局限性。对于实物证据的审查,应主要从其客观真实性、证据来源、保管和鉴定过程、与案件事实的关联性、是否全面等方面进行。对于非法实物证据实行有别于言词证据的裁量排除原则,即只有在相关部门不能补正或者作出合理解释的情况下,才对其予以排除。Physical evidence in criminal trails plays a more convincing role in fact-finding due to its unique objectivity, stability and irreplaceability, which are its advantages compared with other evidences. However, there are some limitations on physical evidence in criminal procedure. Physical evidence should be evaluated mainly by considering its objective authenticity, where it comes from, how it is kept and identified, its connection with facts and so on. The exclusion of illegally-obtained physical evidence is different from that of oral evidence. It will be excluded only with neither additional proofs nor rational explanations.

关 键 词：刑事审判 实物证据 审查判断 排除 

分 类 号：D915.13[政治法律—诉讼法学]