检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:丛日昌[1] 张海川[2] 林荣封[2] 韩丽川[1] 白玉[2]
机构地区:[1]广东医学院附属西乡人民医院眼科,中国广东省深圳市518102 [2]广东医学院附属西乡人民医院耳鼻喉科,中国广东省深圳市518102
出 处:《国际眼科杂志》2012年第7期1399-1401,共3页International Eye Science
摘 要:目的:比较改良的传统泪囊鼻腔吻合术和经鼻内镜下泪囊鼻腔吻合术治疗慢性泪囊炎的临床疗效。方法:选取病历资料完整、行手术治疗的慢性泪囊炎患者112例,其中行改良的传统泪囊鼻腔吻合术患者53例,行鼻内镜下泪囊鼻腔吻合术患者59例。结果:统计经过6~12mo的随访观察,改良的传统泪囊鼻腔吻合术组有效51例,有效率96.2%,经鼻内镜下泪囊鼻腔吻合组有效55例,有效率93.2%,两组差异比较无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:经鼻内镜下泪囊鼻腔吻合术具有较多优点,避免了面部瘢痕,符合现代微创手术要求;掌握手术指征,其手术效果可接近改良的传统泪囊鼻腔吻合术。AIM: To compare the effects of modified traditional dacryocystorhinostomy with intranasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy on chronic dacryocystitis. METHODS: Totally 112 cases with complete medical records were studied retrospectively including 53 cases with modified traditional dacryocystorhinostomy(group A) and 59 cases with intranasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy(group B). RESULTS: In group A, after 6-12 months follow-up, 51 of 53 (96.2%) cases had good results; while in group B, 55 of 59 (93.2%) cases had good results. There was no statistical significant difference between the two groups (P 〉0.05). CONCLUSION:The intranasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy is an effective mini-invasive operation with no facial surgical scar and its operative effect can approach that of modified traditional dacryocystorhinostomy if surgical features are grasped well.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3