检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张立涛[1] 崔群生[1] 刘志强[1] 王昭华[1] 孔庆奎[1]
机构地区:[1]泰山医学院附属泰山医院影像诊断科,山东泰安271000
出 处:《泰山医学院学报》2012年第3期193-195,共3页Journal of Taishan Medical College
摘 要:目的比较MR增强扫描和钼钯对乳腺导管原位癌的诊断价值。方法收集2010~2011年经手术证实为导管原位癌的33位病人(平均年龄60岁,平均病灶大小15 mm)作为研究对象,在术前常规进行MR增强扫描和钼钯检查。结果在经病理证实为导管原位癌33例病人中,MR增强扫描诊断出29例患导管原位癌,其敏感性是87.9%。其中有4例导管原位癌被诊断为良性。而33例病人中钼钯检查诊断21例患导管原位癌(其中包括没有被MR检出的病人),其敏感性是63.6%,其它12例都是由MR增强扫描诊断出。结论钼钯和MR增强扫描都能检出没有钙化的隐匿性导管原位癌,但是MR增强扫描在诊断伴有钙化的小的病灶时需要经钼钯证实。Objective: To compare mammography with contrast-enhanced MRI in the diagnosis of histopathologically verified subtypes of ductal carcinoma in situ(DCIS).Methods: All patients with verified pure DCIS lesions(no signs of invasion or microinvasion) after surgery were identified between 2005 and 2007.Selection criteria were performed mammography and contrast-enhanced MRI at our institute prior to surgery resulting in a cohort of 33 patients(mean patient age,60 years;mean lesion size,15 mm).Results: Contrast-enhanced MRI enabled identification of DCIS in 29 of 33 patients with histopathologically verified pure DCIS,with an overall sensitivity of 87.9% for this patient cohort.The remaining 4 showed no signs of malignancy by contrast-enhanced MRI.In mammography,21 of the 33 patients revealed suspicious outcome(including all lesions not detected by contrast-enhanced MRI),demonstrating an overall sensitivity of 63.6%.The remaining 12 mammographically occult DCIS lesions were all identified in contrast-enhanced MRI.Conclusion: Contrast-enhanced MRI can diagnose mammographically visible and also occult DCIS lesions without microcalcifications.Only small DCIS foci with microcalcifications can additionally be verified by mammography supposing contrast-enhanced MRI as a diagnostic approach
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28