应用TOPSIS法与秩和比法综合评价我院近8年的医疗工作质量  

Applications of TOPSIS in association with RSR in the hospital synthetical evaluation with the quality of medical work in recent 8 years

作　　者：刘争[1] 

机构地区：[1]中日友好医院信息处统计室,北京100029

出　　处：《中日友好医院学报》2012年第3期161-163,共3页Journal of China-Japan Friendship Hospital

摘　　要：目的：对我院2004~2011年医疗工作质量进行综合评价,并进行分析。方法：采用门诊量（X1）、急诊量（X2）、出院者人数（X3）、手术量（X4）、病床使用率（X5）、病床周转次数（X6）、出院者平均住院日（X7）、治愈好转率（X8）、死亡率（X9）9个常用医疗工作指标,应用逼近理想解排序（TOPSIS）法及秩和比（RSR）法相结合进行统计分析。结果：2010、2011年为优,2007、2008、2009年为良,2005、2006年为中,较差的为2004年。结论：我院近年来的医疗工作质量呈逐年上升趋势。应用TOPSIS法和RSR法相结合进行综合评价,能客观反映出医疗工作质量的优劣程度。Objective：To inquire the advantage of technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution（TOPSIS）in association with rank-sum ratio（RSR）in synthetical evaluation of medical quality in the hospital from 2004 to 2011.Methods：We used the TOPSIS and RSR methods for statistical analysis,including the amount of outpatient（X1）,the amount of emergency（X2）,the number of discharges（X3）,the amount of surgery（X4）,the rate of bed utilization（X5）,the frequency of bed rotation（X6）,the average days of hospitalization（X7）,the rate of cure and improvement（X8）and the case fatality rate（X9）.Results：Medical quality was excellent in 2010 and 2011,fine in 2007,2008 and 2009,medium in 2005 and 2006,poor in 2004.Conclusion：In recent years the quality of medical work of the hospital showed an increasing trend.Methods of TOPSIS in association with RSR can objectively reflect the different periods of the pros and cons of the quality of medical work in hospital.

关 键 词：逼近理想解排序法 秩和比法 综合评价 

分 类 号：R197.3[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]