凯尔森宪法保障思想的逻辑——兼评施密特及中国的政治宪法学  

Logic of Kelsen's Constitution Guarantee Theory——Comment on Political Constitution of Schmidt and China

作　　者：骆正言[1] 

机构地区：[1]江苏广播电视大学公共管理系,江苏南京210038

出　　处：《重庆工商大学学报（社会科学版）》2012年第4期60-65,共6页Journal of Chongqing Technology and Business University：Social Science Edition

基　　金：2010年度教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目(10YJC820081)"宪法视野下的人格权保护";2010年度安徽省教育厅人文社会科学研究一般项目(2010sk168)"人格权的宪法保护研究"

摘　　要：凯尔森是奥地利宪法法院之父,他的纯粹法学、基本规范思想在国内获得了广泛传播,但他关于宪法法院的思想却并没有得到深入的挖掘。经过研究,本文发现,凯尔森从两个方面论证德国应该采用司法型的宪法保障制度。首先,他认为要想维护宪法的最高效力,要想整个法律体系不发生矛盾,必须建立强有力的司法审查制度。其次,他认为按照法律理论的发展逻辑和权力制约的必然要求,应该在民主选举的基础上建立司法审查制度。时至今日,凯氏的论证同样有助于匡正当前方兴未艾的政治宪法学思潮,廓清我国宪法保障的理论基础。Hans Kelsen is the father of Austrian constitutional court,whose pure jurisprudence and basic norm have been widespread in China,but his idea of constitutional court has not been studied thoroughly.Through deep research,this paper finds out that Kelsen proposed that judicial constitutional guarantee system should be used in Germany from two perspectives,firstly he said that it was necessary to institute judicial review in order to maintain the highest power and to eradicate contradictions of legal system,secondly he held that,according to development logic of legal theory and necessary requirement for political power restriction,it was inevitable to establish judicial review on the basis of democratic election.Up to now,Kelsen’s argument is still beneficial to correct the present unfolding political constitution theory and to clarify the theoretic foundation of China’s constitution guarantee.

关 键 词：凯尔森 宪法的最高性 宪法法院 政治宪法学 德国 施密特 

分 类 号：D911[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]