检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈礼森 陈俐利[2] 孙勇[2] 范捷[2] 齐春子
机构地区:[1]解放军92910部队海谊医院 [2]成都军区机关医院 [3]解放军69240部队口腔科
出 处:《牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志》2012年第6期351-353,350,共4页Chinese Journal of Conservative Dentistry
摘 要:目的:通过对体外牙根管的测量,比较TCM Endo V和Tri Auto ZX两种根管测量仪在根管再治疗病例中的测量精度。方法:选择人新鲜拔除根尖发育完备具有较直单根管的上下颌切牙46个,使用不锈钢锉测量实际工作长度后进行根管预备充填,采用两种根管测量仪对充填后根管使用自动回旋模式和非回旋电测量模式进行测量,对比两种测长仪的精确性。结果:两种设备均可获得精确的根尖长度。两种系统在回旋模式测得的值(ARL)均超出了真实工作长度(TL)和非回旋模式测得的值(EL)。结论:自动回旋模式和非回旋模式相比有明显差异(P<0.05),ARL较TL和EL偏大。非回旋模式下测量更精确,Tri AutoZX系统精确性更高。AIM: To evaluate ex vivo the accuracy of the integrated electronic root canal length measure- ment devices within TCM Endo V and Tri Auto ZX motors in the retreatment of filled root canals. METHODS : Forty six freshly extracted maxillary and mandibular incisor teeth with mature apices were selected. Following cavity prepara- tion, we compared the true root canal length and those indicated by the two devices when used in automatic apical re- verse function length (ARL) and when inserted passively (electronic measurement of canal length, EL). RESULTS: ARL values measured by the two devices were both significantly greater than EL and the true length ( P 〈 0.05 ). CONCLUSION: There were significant differences between the accuracy of measurements in active (rotating) and passive (not- rotating) modes; both devices were more accurate when used in passive mode. However, the Tri Au- toZX was significantly more accurate in a greater proportion of cases.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.137.162.63