OECD国家高等教育投入的典型模式  

The Typical Patterns of Investment to Higher Education in OECD Countries

作　　者：刘红宇[1] 马陆亭[2] 

机构地区：[1]北京航空航天大学高等教育研究所,北京100191 [2]教育部教育发展研究中心,北京100816

出　　处：《高等教育研究》2012年第5期102-109,共8页Journal of Higher Education

摘　　要：OECD成员国高等教育多样化发展路径及其繁荣,是与它们合理选择符合自己国情的投入模式密不可分的。其典型模式主要有:一是以美国为代表的财政投入、社会投入和个人投入都较高的"三高模式";二是以韩国为代表的"以社会投入为主,政府投入为辅"的"社会主导"模式;三是以法国为代表的"政府投入为主的中央集权制"模式;四是以丹麦等北欧国家为代表的"国家买单"模式。它给我们的启示是:在社会快速发展时期,必须保证高等教育投入总量的增长,同时要重视社会投入的作用。Diversification in higher education development path and prosperity of OECD countries with a reasonable choice in line with their national conditions and input mode are inseparable. There are four typical patterns： firstly, the United States model, which the fi- nancial investment, social investment and personal investment are ＂three tops＂; secondly, a Korea-based representative of ＂society-led model＂ with the higher social investment and gov- ernment investment supplemented; thirdly, France-based representative, called the central- ized system of government investment mode; fourth, Denmark and other Nordic country as the representative of ＂country pay＂ model. It shows that, the country should ensure the to- tal growth of higher education in the rapid development period, and pay attention to the im- portant role of social investment at the same time.

关 键 词：OECD国家 高等教育发展 投入模式 社会投入 

分 类 号：G467.2[文化科学—教育学] G649[文化科学—教育技术学]