影响师范大学生人际交往障碍的因素分析  

Impacting factors of interpersonal communication disorder among nonmal university students

作　　者：田澜[1] 刘杨[1] 

机构地区：[1]湖北师范学院教师教育研究与发展中心,湖北黄石435002

出　　处：《湖北师范学院学报（自然科学版）》2012年第2期26-31,共6页Journal of Hubei Normal University(Natural Science)

基　　金：湖北省教育厅人文社科项目(2008y300)

摘　　要：采用《大学生交流心理障碍问卷》对360名师范大学生进行调查,结果发现:大学生总体人际交往障碍水平低于中点"3",受测大学生的人际被动感和人际羞怯感相对较高,人际冷漠感相对较低;男大学生的人际冷漠感显著高于女大学生(P<0.01);理科大学生的人际被动感显著高于文科大学生(P<0.05);贫困组大学生的人际羞怯感、人际冷漠感和自我退缩感均显著高于家庭经济一般状况组学生(P<0.05);富裕组大学生的人际冷漠感显著高于一般组和贫困组学生(P<0.01或P<0.001);身体健康组学生的人际羞怯感、情绪失调感及总体交往障碍显著低于身体一般组和身体虚弱组学生(P<0.05,P<0.01或P<0.001);健康组大学生的人际冷漠感和自我退缩感显著低于一般组学生(P<0.01).The results shawed that total interpersonal communication disorder was slightly lower than the “mid - point 3”. Uni- versity students had higher scores on interpersonal passiveness and interpersonal shyness, but relatively lower scores on inter- personal indifference. Male students showed markedly higher disorder level than female students on interpersonal indifference （ P 〈 0. Ol ） ; Students majoring in science had significantly higher scores of interpersonal passiveness than those of the students in liberal arts majors ; Students who suffered from poverty got significantly higher interpersonal shyness, self - retreatness and interpersonal indifference scores than those from general families （P 〈 0.05 ） ; Students from wealthy families had significantly higher scores of interpersonal indifference than those from general and poor families（ P 〈 0. 01 or P 〈 0. 001 ）. Students in good health got significantly lower interpersonal shyness , emotional dissonance and total interpersonal communication disorder scores than those in general and worse health. Students with good health showed significantly lower interpersonal indifference and self -retreatness than those with general condition.

关 键 词：大学生 人际交往 心理障碍 

分 类 号：G449[哲学宗教—心理学]