检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱磊[1] 尚光伟[1] 余芳[1] 徐远志[1] 汪饶饶[1] 房莉[1]
机构地区:[1]同济大学附属第十人民医院口腔中心,上海200072
出 处:《口腔医学》2012年第6期362-364,共3页Stomatology
摘 要:目的研究Hero Shaper镍钛机用根管预备器械去除根管旧充填物的能力。方法选取临床拔除的48个单根管前牙,随机分为2组,用改良式逐步后退法进行根管预备,牙胶尖与碧兰糊剂侧方加压充填根管。放置30 d后用不同的方法去除根管旧充填物:A组为H型锉+氯仿组;B组为Hero Shaper+氯仿组;记录操作时间。将牙根纵劈,立体显微镜下观察根管冠1/3,中1/3,根1/3的残留物情况。结果在根管的3部分,2种方法清理后的残留物量均无统计学差异(P>0.05)。B组操作时间明显少于A组,具有统计学差异(P<0.01)。结论根管再治疗中,使用Hero Shaper镍钛机用根管预备器械可以减少操作时间,获得和H锉相似的清理效果。Objective To study the treatment efficacy of Hero Shaper NiTi rotary instruments in removing old root filling materials.Methods 48 extracted single-rooted anterior teeth were divided randomly into two groups,24 in each group.Modified step-back flare technique was used for root canal preparation,and teeth were filled with gutta-percha and Cortisomol sealer by lateral condensation.Different methods were used to remove the old root filling materials 30 days later.Retreatment of group A was done with H files with chloroform,group B with Hero Shaper NiTi rotary instruments and chloroform.The time of the retreatment was recorded.The teeth were then split vertically into halves.The remaining gutta-percha/ sealer on the apical,middle,coronal parts of the root canal walls was visually scored with stereomicroscope.Results There was no significant difference in the amount of gutta-percha and sealer remaining on the root canal walls between the two groups at all three levels(P〉0.05).The mean operation time of group B was obviously less than that of group A,which had significant differences.Conclusions Hero Shaper NiTi rotary instruments and H file have the similar retreatment effectiveness,but Hero Shaper NiTi rotary instruments can reduce the operation time.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.226.159.125