亲手犯与身份犯关系辨析——以实行行为类型为视角  

Differentation between Status Crime and Self-implemented Crime——From Angle of Types of Perpetrating Act

作　　者：古瑞华[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]武汉大学法学院,湖北武汉430072 [2]信阳师范学院政法学院,河南信阳464000

出　　处：《太原理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2012年第4期12-16,21,共6页Journal of Taiyuan University of Technology(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：信阳师范学院青年基金项目(201102)

摘　　要：亲手犯虽最初以间接正犯的对立物出现,但在根本上应从犯罪的性质出发,以法益侵害和构成要件定型性作为主体与行为能否分离的判断要素。亲手犯与身份犯的关系上,同一说与排斥说均有不妥之处;将身份犯的实行行为作可让渡的实行行为、部分可让渡的实行行为,以及不可让渡的实行行为之类型划分,可以较清晰地厘清身份犯与亲手犯之间的交叉关系。Dispite of beginning as the antithing of indirected-implemented crime,we should study self-implemented crime from the essence of crime, that is legal benefit-encroached and typed con- stitutive requirements are the two factors to judge if crime actor can be seperated with perpetra- ting act. The identity theory and excludsion theory are all defective on comparision of self-imple- mented crime and status crime. If we divide perpetrating act into three types：alienable act, partly alienable act and inalienable act, we can clearly confirm the cross relation between them.

关 键 词：亲手犯 身份犯 实行行为 法益侵害 构成要件定型性 交叉关系 

分 类 号：D924.11[政治法律—刑法学]