机构地区:[1]上海交通大学医学院附属仁济医院神经外科,上海200127 [2]上海交通大学医学院附属仁济医院皮肤科,上海200127
出 处:《应用激光》2012年第3期251-260,共10页Applied Laser
摘 要:目的:探讨HPPH光动力治疗对鼠G422脑胶质瘤脑部及腋部皮下移植瘤缺氧诱导因子(HIF-1α)、血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)表达的影响并和HpD-PDT做比较。方法:建立鼠G422脑胶质瘤、腋部皮下移植瘤模型,设立空白对照组、单注射HPPH 0.45mg/kg组、单665nm激光照射组、单630nm激光照射组、HPPH-PDT组(0.15、0.3、0.45mg/kg组)、HpD-PDT 5mg/kg组。单注射HPPH组、HPPH-PDT组和HpD-PDT组自尾静脉推注入光敏剂,24h后以波长665nm的半导体激光照射HPPHPDT组和单激光组肿瘤,功率密度200mW/cm^2,每光斑照射17min,能量密度为204J/cm^2;以波长630nm的半导体激光照射HpD-PDT组肿瘤,功率密度200mW/cm^2,每光斑照射20min,能量密度为240J/cm^2。于PDT后9d处死鼠,取肿瘤、肿瘤边缘、正常脑组织及血液,行酶联免疫吸附法(ELISA)的双抗体夹心法检测HPPH-PDT和HpD-PDT后及对照组缺氧诱导因子(HIF-1α)、血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)。结果:鼠G422脑胶质瘤脑部及腋部皮下移植瘤,空白、单注药和单照光三组对照组之间缺氧诱导因子(HIF-1α)、血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)表达值两两比较,P>0.05,差别无统计学意义。不同剂量HPPH、HpD光敏剂PDT治疗鼠G422脑胶质瘤脑部移植瘤,HIF-1α、VEGF平均值,HPPH-PDT各组较HpD-PDT低,0.3mg/kg-PDT组、0.45mg/kg-PDT组低于0.15mg/kg-PDT组及HpD-PDT组,P<0.05,有显著差异。HPPH-PDT 0.3mg/kg-PDT组、0.45mg/kg-PDT二组值接近。HPPH-PDT 0.3mg/kg-PDW组、0.45mg/kg-PDT接近正常脑值,0.15mg/kg-PDT及HpD-PDT组稍高于正常脑值,但P>0.05,无显著差异,HPPH-PDT各组及HpD-PDT组值均明显低于对照组(空白组、单注HPPH、单注射HpD组、单665nm激光照射组、单630nm激光照射组),P值<0.05,有显著差异。各组肿瘤边缘的值稍高于肿瘤值,血液的值较肿瘤低,接近或稍高于正常脑值。不同剂量HPPH、HPD光敏剂PDT治疗鼠G422胶质瘤腋部皮下移植瘤HIF-1α、VEGF平均值,HPPH-PDT各组较HpD-PDT低,0.3mg/kg-PDT组、0Objective: The expression of HIF-1α and VEGF of mice g422 glioma brain and subcutaneous axillary tumors in response to HPPH-PDT was evaluated. The comparison of effect of HPPH-PDT and HpD-PDT was assessed. Methods: The mice G422 glioma model in brain and subcutaneous axillary tumors was established. Mice suffering G422 glioma were randomly divided into seven groups: blank control,HPPH 0.45 mg/kg alone,665nm laser alone,HPPH-PDT (0.15 mg/kg,0.3 mg/kg,0.45 mg/kg )and HpD-PDT5mg/kg. Mice were injected intravenously with 0.15,0.3,0.45 mg/kg of HPPH utilizing 665nm diode laser doses of 204 J/cm^2 at 200mW/cm^2 delivered at 24 hours post drug injection for HPPH-PDT groups. For HpD-PDT group, 24 hours after intravenous injection of HpD 5 mg/kg, 630 nm diode laser doses of 240 J/cm^2 at 200 mW/cm^2 was given. The expression of HIF-1α and VEGF of mice g422 glioma (tumor , edge of tumor, blood ) was tested on the ninth day post PDT by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Results: No significant difference of expression of HIF-1α and VEGF among blank control group,HPPH0.45mg/kg alone group and 665 nm laser alone group. Compared with blank control group, expression of HIF-1α and VEGF of HPPH-PDT groups significantly decreased, P〈0.01. Expression of HIF-1α and VEGF of HPPH-PDT 0.3 mg/kg and 0.45mg/kg group was lower than that of 0.15 mg/kg group obviously, P〈0.05. No significant difference between 0.45 mg/kg group and 0.3 mg/kg group, P〉0.05. Expression of HIF-1α and VEGF of HPPH-PDT 0.3 mg/kg group decreased in comparison with HpD-PDT group. Conclusion: HPPH-PDT induced decrease HIF-1α and VEGF expression. Appropriate dose was 0.3 mg/kg. Expression of HIF-1α and VEGF of HPPH-PDT was lower than that of HpD-PDT.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...