检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]天津市口腔医院,300041 [2]河北医科大学附属口腔医院
出 处:《天津医药》2012年第7期669-671,共3页Tianjin Medical Journal
摘 要:目的:探讨不同牙体预备方法对瓷贴面成功率的影响。方法:采用唇面覆盖型(I型)、唇切缘覆盖型(L型)、唇切邻面覆盖型(U型)3种牙体预备方法,对39例患者共计97颗患牙行瓷贴面修复,于修复后1周、6个月、12个月、18个月复诊,观察不同牙体预备方式的修复体保存完整度、颜色匹配、边缘适合性及术后过敏等指标。结果:I型在第12个月随访时有1颗患牙修复体出现裂纹,L型在第12个月和18个月随访时各有1颗患牙修复体出现裂纹和边缘有微小间隙,U型在第6个月有1颗患牙修复体在颜色和半透明度上与邻牙不一致,第18个月随访时有1颗患牙修复体出现裂纹,3种牙体预备方式瓷贴面成功率差异无统计学意义。结论:选择合理的牙体预备方式进行瓷贴面修复,能够获得较佳的修复效果。Objective: To explore the achievement rates of porcelain laminate restoration based on different preparation designs. Methods: Thirty-nine patients and 97 porcelain laminate veneers were prepared by facies labialis overlap (type I), incisive edge overlap (type L) and finishing lines extended proximally (type U). The veneers' integrity, fracture, the marginal situation and color match were evaluated at 1 week, 6 months, 12 months and 18 months. Results: There was 1 failure in type I at 12-month follow-up, 1 failure at 12-month and I failure at 18-month follow-up in type L and 1 failure at 6-month and 1 failure at 18-month follow-up in type U. There was no significant difference in achievement rate between 3 type preparations. Conclusion: The excellent effect of porcelain laminate restorations can be obtained by preparing the way of dental ceramic veneer.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15