国际项目融资中的环境争端及其解决——以新加坡丰益集团印尼棕榈油项目案为例  

The Environment Dispute in International Project Financing and Settlement Thereof:Taking Indonesia Palm Oil Project of Wilmar Group as an Instance

作　　者：谭宇生[1] 

机构地区：[1]广东石油化工学院文法学院,广东茂名525000

出　　处：《东南亚研究》2012年第3期9-15,共7页Southeast Asian Studies

基　　金：广东石油化工学院博士启动基金项目"国际法庭与环境争端的解决"(2010b10)

摘　　要：如何避免和解决国际项目融资中的环境争端,现已成为各国政府、投资方、项目所在地的当地社群以及国际组织等各方密切关注的问题。2007年新加坡丰益集团印尼棕榈油项目案受到了国际社会的高度关注。审查该案的是世界银行合规顾问/监察专署(CAO)。CAO允许可能受到项目直接影响的个人、社群或非政府组织就项目产生的社会和环境问题提出申诉。国际金融公司(IFC)的履行标准是CAO裁决的重要准据,而非政府组织的一些理念和准则也可能成为争端解决的依据。这使得私方在争端的进程和争端解决中占据着重要地位。投资东道国政府应考虑对相关的国内法规适时进行修改完善,同时关注非政府组织的动向,以免在争端发生时陷入被动。How to avoid and resolve the environment disputes related to the international project financing has become a common concern for the governments, investors, local community and international organizations. That is why international society pays so much attention to the case of Indonesia Palm Oil project of Wilmar Group. It is the Office of the Compliance Advisor/Ombudsman （CAO） that addresses the case, which allows individuals, commu- nity groups, local and international NGOs affected by projects to lodge a complaint for the social and environmental problems. CAO reviews the case according to IFC＇s Performance Standards as well as some NGOs＇ ideas and guidelines. This makes the private parties become an important role in the disputes and settlement thereof. The government of host country should amend its domestic laws in good time and observe NGOs＇ action to avoid disadvantageous outcome.

关 键 词：国际项目融资 环境争端 环境保护 油棕种植园 合规顾问/监察专署 

分 类 号：F279.342[经济管理—企业管理]