检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]福建省医疗保险管理中心铁路分中心,福州350013 [2]中国人民健康保险股份有限公司福建分公司,福州350001
出 处:《中国药房》2012年第26期2409-2411,共3页China Pharmacy
摘 要:目的:评价福州地区4家三级甲等医院住院患者免疫增强剂的应用情况。方法:调取福建省医疗保险管理中心铁路分中心4家三级甲等医院2010年2267份住院患者病历,按是否应用免疫增强剂、出院诊断分别统计住院人次、次均费用等指标,并分析免疫增强剂的联用情况。结果:应用免疫增强剂的住院次均费用为(24331.09±23745.02)元,显著高于未应用组(15980.43±18197.10)元(P<0.001);免疫增强剂应用于15类疾病,86.63%的患者应用1~2个品种;不同医院免疫增强剂应用率、次均费用、联用品种数、疾病谱有明显区别。结论:所调查医院的免疫增强剂存在不合理应用现象;用药监管有利于临床应用规范化;基本医疗保险经办机构应制定有针对性的措施引导合理用药。OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the application of immunoenhancer in the inpatients from 4 Grade-Three-Class-A hospitals in Fuzhou. METHODS: Medical records of 2 267 inpatients were collected from 4 Grade-Three-Class-A hospitals in 2010. The inpatient cares-time and cost each time were calculated according to whether immunoenhancer was used or not and discharge diagnosis, and combined use of immunoerthancer was analyzed. RESULTS: The costs of hospitalization for those patients who used immunoenhancer were (24 331.09 ± 23 745.02) yuan each time, which were significantly higher than the unused group (15 980.43±18 197.10) yuan (P〈0.001). Immunoenhancer was used for 15 disease categories. About 86.63% of patients used 1 or 2 varieties. Utilization ra- tio of different hospitals, average cost of immunoenhancer each time, the quantities of combined use and disease spectnma were ap- parently different. CONCLUSION: The use of immunoenhancer existed irrational situation. Medical supervision help to standardize the use of immunoenhancer. Basic medical insurance agencies should develop targeted measures to guide rational drug use.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.215