检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]肇庆医学高等专科学校,广东肇庆526020 [2]中山大学光华口腔医学院附属口腔医院,广东广州510055 [3]香港大学矫形与创伤外科学系
出 处:《临床口腔医学杂志》2012年第7期406-409,共4页Journal of Clinical Stomatology
基 金:国家自然科学基金面上项目(30973355)
摘 要:目的:探讨仿生溶液(SBF)检测种植体生物活性的准确性。方法:采用宏观形貌一致的两种商用种植体Osseotite和NanoTiteTM分别体外浸泡于仿生溶液及DMEM+10%胎牛血清培养基中14天,应用X-射线光电子能谱仪(XPS)、扫描电镜(SEM)检测其表面磷灰石形成情况。结果:SBF中的两种样本表面无明显晶体形成;DMEM培养基中Osseotite表面无明显晶体形成,NanoTiteTM表面磷灰石晶体成球状簇集,并伴大量有机分子附着;XPS显示NanoTiteTM经DMEM浸泡后表面磷灰石晶体为碳酸羟基磷灰石。结论:SBF作为材料表面生物活性的检测模型,可导致假阴性结果的出现。有机大分子对生物矿化层的形成具有显著影响,以DMEM培养基作为体外生物活性研究模型的检测结果可信度更高。Objective: To determine whether simulated body fluid (SBF) is suitable to estimate surface bioactivity of dental implants or not. Method: Two types of commercial dental implants (Osseotite and NanoTite^TM) with the same macrotopography were investigated on apatite formation in vitro by soaking separately with SBF and DMEM for 14 days. The results were studied by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Result: No apatite formation was detected on all samples after soaking in SBF. But globular, uniform apatite-like mineral deposits, accompany with organic molecular attachment was detected on the NanoTiteTM surface by soaking it in DMEM. Conclusion:SBF does not appear to be suitable to estimate surface bioactivity of a material, but DMEM shows potential for immersion test, as the influence of organic molecular on the apatite formation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.147