检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐驯宇[1] 陈前顺[1] 梁玮[1] 欧德彬[1] 林兴[1] 韩涛[1]
机构地区:[1]福建省立医院胸外科福建医科大学省立临床医学院,福州350001
出 处:《第二军医大学学报》2012年第7期799-802,共4页Academic Journal of Second Military Medical University
基 金:福建省医学创新课题(2012-CX-5)~~
摘 要:目的评价胸腹腔镜下早期食管癌根治术的临床应用价值。方法选择我院2010年6月至2011年12月接受胸腹腔镜(n=56)和传统开胸(n=53)行食管癌根治术的病例资料,比较两组患者的术中情况、术后并发症、复发或转移率、病死率及随访情况等差别。结果腔镜组的手术时间长于开胸组,但失血量、住院时间、转ICU病例数、胸液引流时间、胸液引流量等方面优于开胸组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组的淋巴结清扫数量、阳性淋巴结率差异无统计学意义。腔镜组术后总并发症发生率8.9%,少于开胸组的11.3%,但差异无统计学意义。两组随访3~21个月,腔镜组复发或转移率为5.7%,生存率98.1%;开胸组复发或转移率8.3%,生存率为97.9%;两组在复发或转移率及生存率等方面差异无统计学意义。结论应用胸腔镜联合腹腔镜行食管癌根治术创伤小、并发症少、恢复快,具有与开胸手术相当的近期疗效,是一种安全、可行、临床效果好的微创术式。Objective To evaluate the clinical value of thoracoscopy combined with laparoscopy for the treatment of early stage esophageal carcinoma. Methods From June 2010 to December 2011, 56 patients with esophageal carcinoma receiving thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy (TLE)in our hospital and 53 receiving conventional open esophagectomy(OE) were included in the present study. The operative procedures, postoperative complications, recurrence or metastasis rates, mortality and follow-up outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results Compared with the OE group, TLE group had significantly less blood loss, shorter hospital stay, fewer ICU cases, shorter chest tube duration, less chest drainage amount and longer operation time(P〈0.05). The number of harvested lymph nodes and positive lymph node rate were not significantly different between the two groups. The incidence rate of postoperative complication was 8. 9% in TLE group and 11.3% in OE group (P〉0. 05). The two groups were followed up for 3 to 21 months. TLE group had a recurrence or metastasis rate of 5.7%, similar to that in the OE group (8.35%, P〉0.05). The total survival rate of TLE group was 98.1%, which was similar to that in the OE group ( 97.9%, P〉0.05). Conclusion Thoracoscopic and laparoseopic esophagectomy is a safe,feasible,effective and minimally invasive method for treatment of esophageal cancers it has less complications and quick recovery and has a similar short-term outcome to conventional open esophagectomy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.117.158.174