检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:丁庆国[1] 陆志华[2] 贾传海[1] 陆永明[1] 王建[1]
机构地区:[1]常熟市第二人民医院影像中心,江苏常熟215500 [2]常熟市第一人民医院影像中心
出 处:《实用放射学杂志》2012年第7期1056-1058,1062,共4页Journal of Practical Radiology
摘 要:目的探讨磁共振扩散加权成像(DWD)在胰腺癌与肿块型胰隙炎中的鉴别诊断价值。方法对胰腺癌组(n=17)、肿块型胰腺炎组(n=12)、正常对照组(n=25)均行磁共振常规扫描和DWI(b值取0.600s/mm^2),分析病变组织与正常胰腺DWI信号特点,并测定各组表观扩散系数值(ADC)。定量分析比较各组间ADC值有无统计学差异。结果胰腺癌组、肿块型胰腺炎组、对照组ADC值分别为(1.77±0.08)×10^-3mm^2/s、(1.97±0.17)×10^-3mm^2/s、(1.46±0.28)×10^-3mm^2/s,胰腺癌组ADC值低于肿块型胰腺炎组(t=5.71,P〈0.05)、低于对照组(t=5.34,P〈0.05),肿块型胰腺炎组ADC值高于对照组(t=5.13,P〈0.05)。结论DWI有助于胰腺癌与肿块型胰腺炎的鉴别诊断,可作为常规MRI的重要补充检查办法。Objective To investigate the value of MR diffusion weighted imaging(DWI)in differentiating pancreatic carcinoma from mass-forming pancreatitis . Methods 17 patients with pancreatic carcinoma ( group A ) , 12 cases with mass-forming pancrea titis ( group B )and 25 normal volunteers ( group C ) underwent routine MRI and echo-planar DWI (EPI/DWI ) using b value of 0, 600 s/mm^2. Signal intensities on DWl were compared between three groups and apparent diffusion coefficient ( ADC ) values of three groups were calculated and qualitatively analyzed comparatively among groups . Results The ADC values were ( 1.77 ± 0.08 ) 10 ×10^-3mm^2/s,(1. 97±0. 17)×10^-3mm^2/s,(1.46±0. 28)×10^-3mm^2/s in group A,B and C, respectively. The ADC values of group A was lower than that of group B(t=5. 71,P〈0. 05) and group C(t=5. 34,P〈0. 05) ,respectively. TheADC values of group B was higher than that of group C(t=5.13,P〈0.05). Conclusion DWI provides an important supplement to the routine MRI in differentiating pancreatic carcinoma from mass-forming pancreatitis.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.17.157.68