技术创新中心变迁与技术后发国的追赶路径——基于DEA-Malmquist指数法的检验  

The Switching of Technological Innovation Centre and the Catch-up Path of Later-comers:An Empirical Test by DEA-Malmquist Index Measurement

作　　者：陈一博[1] 

机构地区：[1]复旦大学管理学院博士后流动站暨中国华融资产管理公司博士后工作站,上海200433

出　　处：《科学学与科学技术管理》2012年第7期53-61,共9页Science of Science and Management of S.& T.

摘　　要：运用DEA-Malmquist指数法对美国、英国、日本3个国家1890—1992年和美国、英国、日本、韩国、中国、马来西亚、泰国、印度、巴西、墨西哥等10个国家1975—2005年的技术创新、纯技术效率改进、规模效率改进,以及曼奎斯特生产率指数进行了测度,对"技术引进—消化吸收再创新—自主开发"三阶段最优技术追赶路径进行了实证检验。研究的主要结论是:日本作为技术后发国成功实现追赶的典范,严格遵循了"技术引进—消化吸收再创新—自主开发"三阶段技术追赶路径。亚太、拉美等诸多新兴经济体至今仍处于国际产业分工体系的低端,与其没有遵循三阶段技术追赶路径有关。中国对于技术后发优势的利用较为不足,应当以促进消化吸收再创新作为推进技术创新的政策着力点。By utilizing the DEA-Malmquist index measurement,the paper conducted an empirical test on the data covering years from 1890 to 1992 for the U.S,the UK and Japan,and data of years from 1975 to 2005 of the US,the UK,Japan,Korea,China,Malaysia,Thailand,India,Brazil and Mexico,to test the technological innovation effect,pure technical efficiency improvement effect,scale efficiency improvement effect,and Malmquist productivity index.The conclusion of this paper： Japan,as the successful made of the later-comers,strictly follow the‘technology importing– digesting and re-innovating – self-developing’three stages of optimal catch-up path.Asia-Pacific,Latin America and the other emerging economies are still at low end of the international division chain,the reason is they didn＇t follow the three stages of optimal catch-up path.China＇s usage of late-developing advantages of technology is too inadequate,should promote the absorption and innovation policies to improve technological innovation ability as a focus.

关 键 词：技术创新中心 技术追赶路径 DEA-MALMQUIST指数法 

分 类 号：F273.1[经济管理—企业管理]