我国高校学部的基本权力、分类及相关思考——基于我国学部制改革的调查研究  

The Faculty System Reform Research of the University in China

作　　者：严蔚刚[1] 李德锋[2] 

机构地区：[1]东北师范大学政策研究室,主任吉林长春130024 [2]东北师范大学学校办公室,职员吉林长春130024

出　　处：《中国高教研究》2012年第7期12-16,共5页China Higher Education Research

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"中国环境下的现代大学内部治理结构研究"(项目编号:11YJC880136);吉林省社会科学基金项目"高等学校内部治理的整体优化研究"(项目编号:2012B62)的成果

摘　　要：我国部分高水平研究型大学为促进学科间的交叉与融合以及相关院系的资源整合,积极探索"学部制"改革。按照赋予学部的职责和权力,可以将学部划分为"虚体型"、"实体型"和"实虚结合型"三类。其中虚体型学部是指仅具有跨学院的学术决策或咨询权力,而实体型学部还具有管理学院的行政权力和政治权力。由于管理重心下移和扁平化管理已成为高校内部治理的趋势,同时学部制改革可能会冲击既有的学术生态,所以需取慎重态度,如果改革是以学科和科研发展为直接目的,建议采取虚体型或实虚结合型学部。In order to promote the overlapping and fusion among different disciplines and the resource integration of related departments, part of the high level research universities in China actively explore the reform on the ＂faculty system＂. According to the responsibility and power given to the faculty, it can be divided into three types： ＂virtual type＂, ＂entity type＂ and ＂combination type＂. The ＂virtual type＂ faculty only possesses inter- department academic decision-making or advisory power, while the ＂entity type＂ faculty possesses the administrative and political power of departments except inter-department academic decision-making or advisory power. Because the faculty system reform may impact the existing academic ecology, it should be carried out cautiously. If the direct purpose of the reform is improving the development of subject and research, we recommend ＂virtual type＂ or ＂combination type＂ faculty is founded.

关 键 词：高校 学部制改革 大学治理 调查研究 

分 类 号：G647[文化科学—高等教育学]