检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南京鼓楼医院集团宿迁市人民医院肿瘤科,江苏宿迁223800
出 处:《临床肺科杂志》2012年第8期1460-1462,共3页Journal of Clinical Pulmonary Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨加速超分割胸腔放疗联合EP方案治疗局限期小细胞肺癌的疗效及安全性。方法共72例局限期小细胞肺癌随机分为加速超分割组和常规分割组,其中加速超分割组放疗1.5 Gy/次,2次/日,间隔6小时,总量45Gy;常规分割组1.8~2 Gy/次,1次/日,总量50 Gy。两组全部采用EP方案化疗4~6周期。结果加速超分割组与常规分割组的有效率分别为82.8%和59.4%(P<0.05),加速超分割组与常规分割组的1年、2年和3年生存率分别为90.7%vs 83.1%、55.2%vs43.8%和25.4%vs 17.6%(P<0.05)。主要毒性反应为白细胞减少和放射性食管炎,超分割组的白细胞减少与放射性食管炎较常规分割组有所升高(P<0.05),但均可耐受。结论加速超分割放疗联合EP方案化疗提高了局限期小细胞肺癌的疗效,同时增加了骨髓抑制、放射性食管炎等急性放射性损伤,但是毒性反应可以耐受,值得进一步推广应用。Objective To explore the efficacy and safety of accelerated hyperfractionation radiotherapy combined with EP regimen on limited small cell lung cancer. Methods 72 patients were randomized into two groups : 35 patients in accelerated hyperfractionation radiotherapy (HART) group, 37 patients in conventional fractionation radiotherapy (CFRT) group. Results The total effective rate( PR + CR) in HART group and in CFRT group were 82. 8% and 59. 4%. The 1,2, and 3 year survival rates in HART and CFRT were 90. 7% vs 83. 1% ,55.2% vs 43.8% and 25.4% vs 17.6% ( P 〈 0. 05 ). The main adverse events were leukopenia and radiation esophagitis, which were significantly higher in HART group than those in CFRT group ( P 〈 0. 05 ), but they could be tolerated. Conclusions This study suggests that EP regimen combined accelerated hyperfractionation radiotherapy was more effective and well tolerated. It should be further studied.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30