检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:罗立勤[1] 郑利民[1] 杜鹏程[1] 霍建新[1] 杨建华[1] 张琳[1] 王俊琴[1]
机构地区:[1]包头医学院第一附属医院眼科,内蒙古包头014010
出 处:《中国伤残医学》2012年第7期17-19,共3页Chinese Journal of Trauma and Disability Medicine
基 金:内蒙古自治区高等学校科学研究项目项目编号:NJZY11185;包头市科技计划项目项目编号:2011S2012-01-11
摘 要:目的:通过频域OCT观察玻璃体腔注射曲安奈德(TA)治疗糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)继发黄斑水肿(ME)的临床效果。方法:回顾性分析36例我院眼科常规检查及经FFA和频域OCT检查均确诊为DR继发ME患者36例,视力≤0.6,黄斑中心凹厚度(CMT)≥250μm的患者36只眼纳入观察,进行玻璃体腔注射TA(4mg,0.1ml)治疗。比较治疗前和治疗后1天及1,2,4,8,12,24周最佳矫正视力(BCVA)改变;治疗前和治疗后1,2,4,8,12,24周的黄斑中心凹厚度(CMT)、黄斑中心容积(CMV)、黄斑区平均厚度(AVG)的改变。结果:在治疗后视力显著提高,术后各时间点(P=0.000)均具有统计学意义,BCVA各点分别为:4周0.3962±0.1326;8周0.4936±0.1853;12周0.5164±0.1649,视力基本持平,24周0.3274±0.1812,缓慢下降,术后1周有21例视力提高大于3行,占55.26%。CMT方面,较基线比,在治疗后CMT明显降低,术后各时间点(P=0.000)均具有统计学意义。与基线相比,CMV、AVG两具有显著改变。BCVA分别与CMT、CMV、AVG呈负相关。治疗后眼压未见明显升高。结论:玻璃体腔注射TA治疗糖尿病视网膜病变继发黄斑水肿可明显改善,减轻黄斑水肿。BCVA分别与CMT、CMV、AVG呈负相关,CMV、AVG也可反映治疗效果,但敏感性不及CMT。Objective:To observe the efficiency of IVTA for the treatment of ME in DR by spectra domain OCT.Methods:A total of 38 eyes with ME second to DR were observed.All patients were diagnosed expecially by FFA and spectra domain OCT,with vision≤0.6 and CMT≥250 μ m.All received intravitreal injection of 4mg/0.1ml of TA.BCVA、CMT,CMV,and AVG were compared before and after treatment.Results:After treatment,BCVA were significantly increased in each time point(P=0.000),BCVA in 4(BCVA=0.3962 ± 0.1326),8(BCVA=0.4936 ± 0.1853),12(BCVA=0.5164 ± 0.1649) weeks,were similar.After treatment,compared with baseline,the changes of CMT、CMV and AVG were significantly increased in each time point(P=0.000).Conclusions:IVTA for the treatment of ME in ME could increase BCVA and reduce ME instinctively.CMT can reveal the effect of treatment better than CMV and AVG.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222