论仲裁证据的收集、质证与认定  

Collection,Presentation and Determination of Arbitration Evidence

作　　者：张晓茹[1] 肖贤书[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京航空航天大学法学院,北京100191

出　　处：《北京航空航天大学学报（社会科学版）》2012年第4期45-49,共5页Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics：Social Sciences edition Edition

基　　金：教育部留学回国人员科研启动基金资助项目(37-5131)

摘　　要：中国立法上对仲裁证据收集、质证和认定过于依赖民事诉讼法,使得仲裁制度契约性、民间性等特点难以体现。通过对中国和国外相关立法和仲裁规则的分析可知,在仲裁证据的收集、质证和认定中保留仲裁制度的契约性、民间性,首先应考虑当事人的合意,再考虑仲裁庭是否有权决定,这样更有利于仲裁制度的发展。The legislation of arbitration about Collection, presentation and determination of arbitration evidence exces- sively rely on the civil procedure law. Through the analysis of legislation and arbitration rules of China and other countries, we can draw a conclusion that the character of agreement should be kept. The parties＇ agreement should be considered firstly and then arbitration tribunal. Therefore, the arbitration system can go well.

关 键 词：仲裁证据 质证 证据的认定 

分 类 号：DF72[政治法律—诉讼法学]