检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:舒瑶芝[1]
机构地区:[1]浙江工商大学诉讼法学研究中心浙江杭州310018
出 处:《法学杂志》2012年第7期141-146,共6页Law Science Magazine
基 金:浙江省社会科学基金重点项目(11JCFX01Z)的研究成果;浙江工商大学诉讼法学研究中心项目(2010C004)的研究成果
摘 要:民事执行救济是为了矫正违法或不当执行行为而设立,现行执行救济适用以民事诉讼法规定为主要规范依据,偏重于补救型救济。从体系化构建的视角,执行救济的适用规范涵盖实体法和程序法领域,其制度设计应以实现程序正当、实体公正价值为综合考量,重视发挥执行救济预防及补救的双重功能,合理解决执行救济的竞合问题,以便更好地实现执行程序中当事人和案外人利益的平衡保护。Civil succor execution, nowadays whose main basis is civil procedure laws and which underlines much on remediation, is aimed to correct illegal or inappropriate execution. From the perspective of systematiza- tion, its applicable specifications involves substantive and procedure laws. Due process and substantive justice should be considered synthetically for its system design, and dual functions of prevention and remediation exertion should be emphasized. In the meanwhile, problem of competition of the succor execution should be reasonably solved. Due to the above, a equalized protection of the litigant and the third party interest will be achieved better in the execution.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.94