多药联合预防肺癌术后辅助化疗中胃肠道反应的效果观察  被引量:10

Clinical effect of the combined medication to prevent postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy-related nausea and vomiting

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:朱强[1] 臧琦[1] 孟祥靖[2] 孙东峰[1] 

机构地区:[1]山东省千佛山医院胸外科,济南250014 [2]山东省千佛山医院神经外科,济南250014

出  处:《中国综合临床》2012年第9期985-988,共4页Clinical Medicine of China

摘  要:目的观察多药联合预防肺癌术后辅助化疗中恶心、呕吐的临床效果。方法肺癌术后接受多西他赛+顺铂辅助化疗患者115例,随机分为两组,对照组58例,止吐方案为化疗前半小时静脉注射阿扎司琼10mg/次,第1—5天;静脉注射地塞米松10mg/次,第1~3天。治疗组57例,在对照基础上加用异丙嗪25mg/次、甲氧氯普胺10mg/次,化疗前半小时肌肉注射,第1~5天;奥美拉唑40mg/次,化疗前45min静脉滴注,第1~5天。观察两种方案对预防急性、迟发性恶心、呕吐的效果。结果治疗组与对照组预防急性恶心、呕吐的总有效率差异均无统计学意义(P均〉0.05),预防迟发性恶心第2、3、4、5天的总有效率差异均有统计学意义[分别为87.7%(50/57)与72.4%(42/58),x2=4.21;84.2%(48/57)与67.2%(39/58),X2=4.49;91.2%(52/57)与77.6%(45/58),x2=4.05;94.7%(54/57)与81.0%(47/58),x2=5.04;P均〈0.05],预防迟发性呕吐第2、3、4、5天的总有效率差异均有统计学意义[分别为91.2%(52/57)与74.1%(43/58),x2=5.84;91.2%(52/57)与70.7%(41/58),)(2=7.84;94.7%(54/57)与79.3%(46/58),x2=6.03;98.2%(56/57)与87.9%(50/58),x2=5.77;P均〈0.05]。两组发生的不良反应主要为头晕、头痛、便秘等,组间不良反应发生率[15.8%(9/57)与20.7%(12/58)]差异无统计学意义(x2=0.46,P=0.49)。结论多药联合可显著降低肺癌术后辅助化疗中恶心、呕吐的发生率,特别是对迟发性恶心、呕吐有更好的预防作用。Objective To observe the clinical effect of the combined medication to prevent postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy-related nausea and vomiting after lung cancer surgery. Methods One hundred and fifteen patients under cisplatin-based chemotherapy were randomly divided into the control group ( n = 58 ) and the treatment group ( n = 57 ). For the control group, Azasetron ( day 1 - 5 ) and dexamethasonewere (day 1 -3 )were injected intravenously with a dose of 10 rag/day at half an hour before chemotherapy. For the treatment group, intramuscular injection of promethazine (25 rag/day, 30 rains before surgery ) and metoclopramide( 10 rag/day, 30 rains before surgery)and intravenous infusion of omeprazole (40 rag/day,45 rains before surgery)were given from day 1 to day 5 in addition to the treatment for the control group to relieve chemotherapy-induced acute and late-phased nausea and vomiting. Results There were no significant differences between the two groups in controlling acute nausea and vomiting in terms of complete response rate (Ps 〉0. 05). However, there were significant effect on late-phased nausea,with an effective rate of 87. 7% (50/57) in the treatment group versus 72. 4% (42/58) in the control group at day 2 after treatment(x2 -=4. 21, P 〈0. 05) ,and 84. 2% (48/57) vs. 67.2% (39/58) at day 3(X2 --4.49,P 〈0. 05) ,91.2% (52/57) vs. 77. 6% (45/58) at day 4( X2 =4.05 ,P 〈0. 05) ,94.7% (54/57) vs. 81.0% (47/58) at day 5( X2 =5.04,P 〈0. 05). Furthermore, there were significant effect on late-phased vomiting, with an effective rate of 91.2% (52/57)in the treatment group versus 74. 1% (43/58)in the control group at day 2 after treatment (X2 = 5.84, P 〈 O. 05 ), and 91.2% (52/57) vs. 70. 7% (41/58) at day 3 ( X2 = 7. 84, P 〈 O. 05 ), 94. 7% ( 54/57 ) vs. 79. 3% (46/58) at day 4 ( X2= 6. 03, P 〈 0. 05 ), 98. 2% (56/57) vs. 87. 9% (50/58) at day 5 ( X2 = 5. 77, P 〈 0. 05 )

关 键 词:肺癌 化疗 恶心 呕吐 

分 类 号:R734.2[医药卫生—肿瘤]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象