我国部分地区医疗纠纷第三方调解机制调查分析  

Investigation on the mechanism for third-party mediation in medical dispute in some provinces

作　　者：郑雪倩[1] 高树宽[1] 王将军[2] 曹艳林[3] 靳清汉[4] 文学斌 刘方 

机构地区：[1]中国医院协会医疗法制专业委员会 [2]卫生部中日友好医院,北京市朝阳区樱花园东街100029 [3]中国医学科学院/北京协和医学院医学信息研究所,北京市朝阳区雅宝路3号100020 [4]山东省济宁市第一人民医院,山东省济宁市健康路6号272011 [5]湖南省邵阳市中心医院 [6]北京市医疗纠纷人民调解委员会

出　　处：《中国医院》2012年第7期5-7,共3页Chinese Hospitals

基　　金：中澳卫生与艾滋病项目(HSS902)

摘　　要：目的:对我国部分地区医疗纠纷第三方调解机制的现状进行比较分析。方法:采用焦点组访谈和个人深入访谈方法,对医疗纠纷第三方调解机构等相关部门的负责人进行访谈。结果:我国形成了以医疗纠纷人民调解委员会为主的多元化医疗纠纷调解机制,调解作为医疗纠纷的一种解决方式,对化解医患矛盾,维护医患关系起到了重要作用,但第三方调解在资金、人员及社会认知方面存在一些问题。结论:不断完善医疗纠纷第三方调解机制,更好地发挥其在医疗纠纷解决中的作用。Objectives： To analyze the current status of mechanism for third-party mediation in medical dispute in some provinces.Methods： With focus group discussion and individual depth interview,directors of medical dispute third-party mediation department in some provinces were interviewed.Results： Medical Dispute Peoples Meditation Committee（MDMC） based diverse dispute resolution mechanisms have been established.As a method of alternative dispute resolution（ADR）,the third-party mediation holds great promise in resolving medical malpractice and maintaining the harmonious doctor-patient relationship.However,third-party mediation also faces some challenges,such as finance,staff and social cognition.Conclusions： Third-party mediation in medical dispute is needed to be continuously improved to play better roles on medical dispute solution.

关 键 词：医疗纠纷 第三方调解 

分 类 号：R-052[医药卫生]