作为科学的文艺学:从巴赫金对洛特曼的质疑谈起  

Literary Theory as a Science:On Bakhtin's Question to Lotman

作　　者：李薇[1] 

机构地区：[1]广东轻工职业技术学院旅游系,广东广州510300

出　　处：《中国文学研究》2012年第3期34-37,共4页Research of Chinese Literature

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究西部和边疆地区项目"超越现代与后现代--德勒兹差异思想及其对当代中国美学理论研究的启示"(12XJC751003);广东省普通高校人文社会科学研究项目"西方思维批判与文艺学基础理论的更新及回归"(11WYXM003)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：巴赫金与洛特曼的学术纷争,问题症结在于文艺学学科走向以及文学理论研究路径。洛特曼差异美学汲取巴赫金对话主义,在追求作为科学的文艺学的进程中,保留文艺学的人文内涵,体现了从文学研究到文化研究,从单一学科到跨学科的文学理论变迁,对探索"后理论时代"的文学与文化研究具有启示意义。The academic debate between Bakhtin and Lotman remains a continuing concern in the field of academics. The crux of the problem is the discipline of literary theory direction and research path. With a core of Bakhtin dialogue, Lotman＇ s dif- ferential aesthetic theory in the pursuit of the science of literary theory, still retains the humanities of literary theory study and em- bodies the theoretical evolution from literary theory study to culture study, from single disciplinary to interdisciplinary literature theory. To this end, differential aesthetic theory enlightens the exploration of literature and cultural research in a ＂Post-theoretic Era＂.

关 键 词：科学 文艺学 巴赫金 洛特曼 

分 类 号：I0[文学—文学理论]