检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北华大学,吉林吉林132013 [2]长春市双阳区林业局,吉林长春130600 [3]前郭县林业局,吉林松原131100 [4]靖宇县靖宇林场,吉林白山135200
出 处:《吉林林业科技》2012年第4期21-25,共5页Journal of Jilin Forestry Science and Technology
摘 要:对普通木质刨花板、麦秸刨花板及稻草刨花板进行了密度、含水率、吸水厚度膨胀率、静曲强度和弹性模量、内结合强度、表面结合强度及握钉力的测试,结果表明,麦秸刨花板在强度方面不及木质刨花板,稻草刨花板在抗弯性能上也无法满足要求,两种秸秆板的握钉力都较差。产生上述差距的关键原因是板坯的密度,另外,与原料形态、加工工艺、机械设备等也有关系。The properties of wood - based parfieleboard, wheat straw particlebeard and wheat straw particleboard were analyzed in this study, including density, moisture content, water thickness swelling, bending strength and modulus of elasticity, the combination of strength, surface bending strength, and grip of the nails. According to the results, there are many gaps between wood particleboard and straw particleboani. The strength of the wheat straw partieleboard was less than wooden board. The bending performance of the rice straw - based partlcleboard could not meet the requirements. The grip of the nails was poor in both the two kinds of particleboards. The key reason for the difference was the density of slab. Furthermore, the form of raw materials, processing teehnology, and mechanical equipment also contributed to the difference.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.98.87