新刑诉法视角下律师在场制度与合适成年人参与制度之比较  

Comparison of the presence of counsel system and the appropriate adult's par-ticipation system in the perspective of the new Criminal Procedure Law

作　　者：周馨雨[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民公安大学,北京100038

出　　处：《辽宁公安司法管理干部学院学报》2012年第3期14-15,共2页Journal of Liaoning Administrators College of Police and Justice

摘　　要：在未成年人司法实践中,针对律师在场与合适成年人参与是否可以合二为一的问题存在许多争议,律师是否可以作为合适成年人是争议的主要焦点。笔者结合新刑诉法,对律师在场制度与合适成年人参与制度的概念、联系、区别进行了详细的比较,从权利属性、适用范围、人员条件、作用、工作方式、可行度六方面阐述了两种制度的区别。In the judicial practice of the minors, there are a lot of controversies whether the presence of counsel can be combined with appropriate adult＇s par- ticipation. Whether the counsel can be the appropriate adult is the main focus of controversy. The author made a detailed comparison between the concept, contact and difference of the presence of counsel system and the appropriate adult＇s par- ticipation system combined with the new Criminal Procedure Law, and discussed the difference between the two systems from the nature of rights, the scope of app- lication, the condition of staff, the role, the way of work and the feasible degree.

关 键 词：新刑诉法 律师在场制度 合适成年人参与制度 比较 

分 类 号：DF73[政治法律—诉讼法学]