检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:彭浩晟[1,2]
出 处:《证据科学》2012年第3期313-321,共9页Evidence Science
基 金:2008年度广东省哲学社会科学"医疗纠纷案件适用法律研究"(08YG-03);2009年度教育部人文社会科学研究课题"医疗损害赔偿法律适用冲突研究"(09YGCZH022)
摘 要:证明责任在医疗损害赔偿纠纷中发挥着风险分配的重要作用,我国近十年的立法充分利用证明责任分配规则来体现立法政策的转变。早期立法体现的证明责任倒置规则导致了大量的非合理性医疗行为,这在更大范围内损害患者的利益。《侵权责任法》矫正了这种倾向,《侵权责任法》根据各种具体情形,规定了更为详细的归责要件,相应地,证明责任分配规则也更加详细具体,较好地分配了医疗风险,平衡了医患双方的诉讼负担。Onus probandi in medical malpractice disputes plays an important role of risk allocation, which has been fully used to embody the transformation of legislative policy in China in the past ten years. The inversion of the burden of proof in early legislation has led to a large number of irrational medical practices, which have greatly damaged patients' interests.. Chinese Tort Law corrected this tendency. According to various specific situations, the Tort law provides elements of Liability in more details. Accordingly, allocation of onus probandi in medical malpractice is more detailed and specific, which properly distributes the medical risks and balances the burden of litigation between doctors and patients as well.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.173