检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《体育与科学》2012年第4期105-108,共4页Sports & Science
基 金:2010国家社科基金项目<中英社区体育发展比较研究>;项目号:10CTY018
摘 要:普通高校体育教学的改革众说纷纭,多从教学者本身的视角来论述如何改进,极少人关注体系本身的价值及走向。研究从理论视角,根据体育教学一贯的指导思想与实践模式作逻辑辨析,并对其存在的合法性和合理性作再认识,指出其"坚守"的弊端和提出"选择"的可能。最后,建议在人文理性和科学理性基础上建立体育教学问责制。There are varied and contending opinions on the reform of college physical education, of which mostly involves improving the teaching from the perspective of the educators and regrettably very few concerns the value and the future of college physical education as a system itself. This paper reconsiders the legality and the reasonability of college physical education in terms of its conventional guiding line of thinking and practical curriculum mode, and points out the disadvantages of persisting in the conventional college physical education curriculum and the possibilities of making new choices. This paper's proposal is accountability for college physical education be introduced in the reforming of the curriculum with humanity and scientific rationality.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222