检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:谭志明[1] 汤日杰[1] 李美璐[1] 张爱芳[1]
机构地区:[1]广州医学院附属肿瘤医院放射科,广东广州510095
出 处:《中国医药导报》2012年第22期142-143,146,共3页China Medical Herald
基 金:广东省第三批科学事业费计划项目(项目编号:2009B060700085)
摘 要:目的探讨在肝癌介入治疗围术期间开展"以患者为中心"的现代护理模式的疗效。方法将87例行介入治疗的肝癌患者在围术期间按护理方法分成A组45例、B组42例,A组实施现代护理模式、B组实施传统护理模式,评估两种护理模式的效果。结果 A组较B组患者的情绪状态平稳,介入术中配合满意,家属满意度高(P<0.05),术后的不良反应降低(P<0.05)。结论在肝癌介入治疗的围术期,"以患者为中心"的现代护理模式的疗效明显优于传统护理模式。Objective To investigate the therapeutic effect of the patient-centered care of modem nursing mode in TACE of hepatic carcinoma. Methods 87 cases of hepatic carcinoma were divided into two groups: 45 cases of group A and 42 cases of group B, patients in group A were treated by modem nursing mode in perioperation of TACE and patients in group B were given by traditional nursing mode, the therapeutic effect of two nursing modes were evaluated. Results The emotion al state, the cooperation and the satisfaction of family members of group A were better than group B (P 〈 0.05), the incidence of postoperative complications of group A was less than group B (P 〈 0.05). Conclusion The therapeutic effect of the modem nursing mode of group A is superior than the traditional nursing mode of group B in perioperation in TACE of hepatic
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28